NEW: Find your perfect tool with our matching quiz

Take a quiz

Table of Content

No Code Automation vs Code Automation: Which Is Better?

No Code
Linas Kiguolis

Digital transformation is more than just an industry buzzword that came up in recent years. It is happening, and it’s showing no signs of slowing down[1]. Companies and entrepreneurs that don’t keep up with the growing trends of digital transformation find it difficult to stay relevant and competitive in dynamic markets. 

No Code Automation vs Code Automation: Which Is Better

To that end, businesses have had to introduce custom apps that help to deliver business requirements, grow customer interactions, revenue and enhance their digital presence. But before now, developing custom apps was a feat for industry giants with sizable budgets and large and efficient IT teams.

Today, the task of software development has extended to small business users, marketers, customer success teams, and the likes – all generally termed “Citizen Developers”. The conveyors of that extension in the development world are Low Code and No Code platforms.

Developer working using code automation
Photo by olia danilevich

As opposed to traditional software development, Low Code/No Code tools do not necessarily involve writing code at all. Instead, non technical users can create apps with advanced features that meet the set business objectives using a drag and drop interface.

The result of both No Code/Low Code automation and code automation are essentially the same – functional software solutions to further digital transformation. 

This begs the question of which approach you should use. Can No Code and Low Code solutions live up to the hype? How do Low Code/No code solutions and traditional coding stack up against each other in different instances? 

We will be answering these questions and succinctly examining both approaches throughout this article. In the end, you should be able to make a well-informed decision on which development approach is better for you.

Traditional/Custom Software Development (Code Automation)

Traditional software development typically relies on a team of professional developers writing numerous lines of code from scratch to create unique, complex, and powerful applications and web portals.

IT team working with traditional software development
Photo by Sigmund

You can think of traditional development in terms of building a house, for instance. The house building process roughly consists of working with architects to determine an architectural design, hiring a construction company, extensive cost analysis, and you overseeing the project.

Comparatively, to create apps, you’ll need to:

  • Determine the software features and requirements based on software professional opinions and business demand analysis.
  • Create an IT team consisting of experienced professionals.
  • Determine the appropriate tech stack constituting the preferred programming language, databases, etc.
  • Receive preliminary cost estimate.

In summary, traditional development is full of a lot of manual processes that ultimately cost a lot of money and take time.

On the other hand, there’s the option of purchasing a prefabricated house or making slight customizations to an already existing housing development. Likewise, you can use Low Code/No Code automation tools, which use visual drag and drop features, to create applications with powerful features.

Low Code/No Code Development

Low Code and No Code platforms replace the manual approach of writing code with visual modeling. And most non technical users consider both these technologies to be the same and rightly so. Both Low Code and No Code tools are under the umbrella niche of Low Code for now, but both technologies are quite different.

Low Code Platforms

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Low Code history showed that these tools were created as an auxiliary for professional developers to create software solutions all in one platform.

It used pre-made templates and user-friendly drag and drop design tools to help professionals deliver and scale apps faster. Even Integrating with third-party apps and services was easy to do and as a bonus, you get to execute the whole software creation process from design and development to deployment and maintenance, all in one workplace.

Wordpress dashboard
Photo by Pixabay 

Today, citizen developers alike can also create applications using these tools. Nevertheless, in order to fully maximize the capacities of Low Code tools, you’ll need some coding skills.

Low Code platforms give you access to fine-tune the pre-made blocks to exact specifications.

Most Low Code platforms are best suited for businesses with small in-house IT teams constituent of experienced developers or citizen developers with succinct coding skills.

No Code Platforms

The No Code movement seemed to address the concerns on the global shortage of software developers by proposing that anyone – citizen developers – can create web and mobile applications. 

As the name implies, No Code tools require no coding skills whatsoever. All that is needed during No Code development is to drag and drop elements on a blank canvas or pre-made template. The business logic is written in basic English or other supported languages and other specifications are easy to do with selections and imports. For more information on the topic, you can look at what is No Code.

IT team communicating
Photo by charlesdeluvio

As opposed to Low Code platforms where hiring developers was the only way to get the best service; citizen developers can derive the best from the best No Code tools without any coding skills.

Besides mobile and web app creation, No Code and Low Code platforms can help in Robotic Process Automation or build CRMs, workflow automation systems, help desk management systems, a Low Code chatbot, asset management programs, HRMS, etc.

That being said, how do these new tools stack up against the conventional method of software development? Let’s compare!

No Code/Low Code automation vs Code Automation (Full-Code)

With a rough idea of both approaches, we can now compare which is better in several categories; Full Code or Low Code/No Code development.

1. Customization Level and Learning Curve

Low Code and No Code tools will never offer the level of customization offered by traditional coding. Traditional development meant that every little detail, from start to finish, is all decided by the software developer. Can there be any higher level of customization than that? Of course not.

Preferences selection

But there’s another side to the story. Indeed writing code from scratch means that every single detail is defined by the developer or IT team, but what that creates is an overdependence on the developers.

No matter how small a change is to be made, you need the involvement of programmers. This can burden IT teams in markets with dynamically changing demands.

No Code and Low Code automation platforms abstract the technical knowledge required to create business solutions. Professionals and Citizen developers alike can make use of Low Code and No Code automation platforms to automate processes and create scalable, enterprise grade applications.

2. Cost Analysis

Full code is a painstaking process. Writing complex code for custom functionalities and details is burdensome for developers. It’s no wonder hiring developers costs so much.

Profit evaluation

Using Low Code/No Code automation platforms enables users themselves to create custom applications. At most, a small team of professional developers or dedicated citizen developers would do the trick for a startup.

Most No Code platforms and Low Code platforms provide a free version where you can create automated workflows, create and test apps until you’re ready to deploy them. Only then would you need to pay subscription fees or upgrade plans on such tools.

Summarily, developing apps on a No Code/Low Code platform provides significantly more cost savings than creating apps from scratch.

3. Complex Use Cases

Developing with No Code/Low Code platforms is obviously easier than developing using traditional coding. However, when it comes to creating very complex business applications with specific functionality, you may have to do things the hard way.

One of the biggest strong points of traditional development is that there is no level of possible complex functionality that cannot be coded up.

Complex system integrations

However, there is a substantial amount of hearsay in this regard as it concerns Low Code/No Code software. Many business users have been coerced to believe that Low Code software can only be simple. 

Meanwhile, there are a number of No Code and Low Code platforms that make delivering complex enterprise grade apps easy. Nevertheless, Low Code/No Code solutions will more than likely have a relatively limited capacity in developing complex apps in comparison with traditional coding.

4. Time Factor

The digital market is constantly evolving and business demand and conditions keep changing. What’s more, business users have to assume that competitors will be able to keep up with this rapidly changing market in order to move the business forward.

In order to keep up with such dynamic markets, business users need to respond to business requirements quickly and efficiently. No Code and Low Code tools champion this category.

Time management

With Low Code/No Code tools, you can accelerate business processes with automated workflows and build business apps without bothering about delays and debugging setbacks.

KPMG [2]made some discoveries further buttress the higher status of Low Code and No Code software as opposed to software projects using the conventional route. Up to 80% of software projects get delayed before deployment which is too much for both startups and existing businesses.

5. Integration

No specific Low Code/No Code tool works independently of other external systems; neither does traditional development. However, the better approach in regards to integration comes down to the previous category -time.

External and internal integrations

It takes less time to integrate Low Code and No Code software with other systems since it uses pre-built plugins and adapters.

6. Security and Stability

It’s quite difficult for a Low Code or No Code tool to be considered entirely stable. Take for instance the Google App Maker No Code platform that suddenly decided to discontinue the product.

In that regard, traditional development is to ascertain that software built with a Low Code/No Code tool is entirely safe. Since most of the development uses pre-made templates and plugins, It’s possible for the citizen developers to create vulnerabilities that they themselves are oblivious to.

Data security

Most Low Code/No Code tools offer permission and access control features to determine citizen developer roles and external access. But even this can’t be compared with the stability and security offered by traditional development.

Meanwhile, there are certain certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC2 Type 2 you should look out for. Their presence ascertains the security of a No Code/Low Code tool based on industry standards.

However, in this category, traditional development methods have an edge over Low Code/No Code automation tools.

Not only can the IT team implement specific security architecture, but they also have full control over the code. The only downside is the developer has to go back to the code to fix any security issues, whereas, for a No Code/Low Code tool, updates and patches are automatically installed.

Low Code/ No Code Platform vs Full Code: Use Cases

Since we now have a solid grasp on how No Code/Low code tools stack up against traditional development, we should also look at when to use each of these technologies.

No Code/Low Code

If your business or startup requires or is going through these conditions then a Low Code/No Code Platform is probably the way to go:

  1. Building a Minimum Viable Product[3] (MVP).
  2. Building partner-facing applications to exploit automation opportunities and modify existing workflows or paper-based processes.
  3. Apps created as microservices[4] as opposed to those created using monolithic architecture improve the ease of app scalability efficiently. So, use a Low Code/No Code platform if that’s your focus.
  4. Low Code/ No Code automation tools are currently the premier standard if you want to automate tasks or engage in advanced business process management.
  5. No Code/Low Code solutions are perfect for developing responsive websites, landing pages, and simple web apps. 

Of course, as we’ve previously concluded, there are many Low Code and No Code tools that can create complex applications. But when it comes to simple web apps and the likes, Low Code/No Code platforms have no competition.

Female developer working using traditional development
Photo by ThisisEngineering RAEng

Traditional Development

Use the traditional development approach if your startup or business meets the following conditions:

  1. Web solutions that require a high level of customization, performance and security throughout the course of the project are preferably created using the traditional development method.
  1. An extensive list of required third-party integration and dependencies.
  2. If you wish to have portable code that you can deploy on a variety of platforms then you should use the traditional application development approach.

Low Code/No Code Automation vs Code Automation: Quick Comparison

PropertyNo Code/Low Code developmentTraditional Development
DefinitionDeveloping software applications using drag and drop tools i.e visual modeling.Developing software by writing multiple lines of code.
ResourcesLow Code and No Code platforms such as Bubble, AppSheet, Webflow, etc.Hard-written code and perhaps, web frameworks like React, Angular, etc.
SkillsetNo coding knowledge is required in No Code platforms and little is required for Low Code development. I.e Citizen developers.Extensive knowledge and experience in programming with web frameworks and APIs.
Speed of developmentRapid application development[5]. Can develop functional apps in weeks or even hours.Creating hard-coded apps takes time. Typically 2-9 months.
AgilitySince changes are dynamically and automatically adapted, development here typically adheres to Agile software development methodology.Discovering and actually making required fixes and changes take too long. However, with the right Agile Methodology such as DevOps, traditional web apps can be Agile also.
MaintenanceUpdates are automatically incorporated here.It’s quite complicated to regularly update and maintain a traditional web app. All changes require the active work of the software team.
Overall App QualityIntegrability and scalability depend on the platform’s offering. Typical app performance and speed are standard but software debugging and testing are quick and error-free.Integrated well with all systems and supports a high level of scalability. Performance and speed are typically high-grade but testing and debugging usually take too much time.

Final Thoughts

Choosing between Low Code/No Code automation and traditional Code automation should be easier with all the information you now have. However, one possibility we haven’t yet discussed is the combination of both approaches.

The myth that Low Code/No Code tools are replacing the traditional development approach is just that, a myth. In fact, these tools are more commonly used in tandem with the traditional development approach. 

Instead of professional developers paying attention to every little detail in development, they can now abstract a large part of the development process with the tools, then focus on the more challenging sections of the code and development process at large.

Of course, using solely one path or the other instead is not especially better or worse. It all just depends on your requirements.


Linas Kiguolis

Need some help with No-code?

As a founder of a traditional software development agency Bright Projects and numerous blockchain projects such as Ertha and Spellfire, Linas is the most experienced member of our crew. He provides a critical perspective towards No Code tools and their capabilities, as there are still many fields where they still cannot replace good old coding.


Read more